Due for discussion on Feb. 17: a taboo topic
Assignment:
Assignment:
Empathy Exams: from Leslie Jamieson
This essay is what is often called a "braided" form, with different voices woven within it, using a structure of a series of medical exams, in which the narrator is at first an actor, then a participant. There's a very deliberate use of repetition which I was impatient with, as a reader, to begin, and then I began to understand what the writer was up to. Memoir can take so many forms, and this is a very intriguing one. It may give you ideas as to how you want to go about writing a memoir; what from your life might you take to improvise a narrative structure? How could you affect the atmosphere, the mood of the piece, with a different structure? These are questions that get answered over time and with drafts, but are well worth thinking about.
For our assignment Feb. 17th, please read and notate what interests you of "The Empathy Exams" and the three Ellen Bass poems I gave you in class last night. Then, write a piece from something in your life considered taboo, as in the syllabus assignment. Try writing a scene between at least two people in which something important must happen or be said, and edit down a 2-pp. version for us, acknowledging its sacredness, its great power..
Homework: read excerpt from the Empathy Exams, by Leslie Jamison, and poems from Ellen Bass, The Human Line. Continue taboo exercise; bring two pages on Feb. 17, 2015.
Third Draft:
It would be much
too dangerous to talk about the humor in dying, especially at the
hospice office headquarters. But that is what happened recently.
Collapsing in a
chair in the volunteer office, filling out a time sheet, I caught
Susie's eye. Susie was another volunteer for hospice. She retrieved
some paperwork and looked around for a pen. A few coffee cups and a
plate of half eaten chocolate chip cookies were on the round
work table, along with an over sized crockery jug containing a few
pencils and ball point pens left by pharmaceutical reps. Locating a
pen from the upright jug, one with a cap on it, she put it behind her
ear and looked over at me.
Roz Chast's book
Can't We Talk About Something More Pleasant?
was on my mind. Having just finished reading it, especially mulling over the cartoons, I was thinking
about how I had laughed out loud at some of Chast's drawings. “Are
you going to be around for a little while, Susie?” I asked her as she was picking up the documentation form. I wanted to tell her about
some of the funny, googly eyed characters that I found so humorous in
the book, and also wanted to chat with her about one of my
assignments on the unit.
“Yeah,
talk, I am just filling in the blanks,” she responded in an
off-hand manner. We
chatted a bit about the book, agreeing the approach to the mother
dying was one that was not often broached with such honest insight.
Chatz had described her relationship with her mother as always having
been one of those love/hate, age old dilemmas between a mother and
daughter. Chatz never outwardly opposed her mother, but inwardly
seethed with resentment over past criticisms.
“In the latter part, where the mother was taking so long to die, I just laughed out loud remembering the daughter's eyes popping out of her head, showing both anxiety and frustration. And that part about when the mom reached the Chrysalis Stage, when the mother looks at The Grim Reaper and says 'Back off', Mister.' ” I trailed off with a few chortles, realizing Susie did not have the same reaction as I had toward that scene.
“Well,
I saw nothing humorous about the book. It was serious way of looking
at the problem of dying, including the costs, the indignities, the
suffering. What is funny about that?” Susie was bristling,
“Of
course, there is nothing funny
about her dying, just that the cartoons were so realistic, so very
much how that was my experience with mother taking such a long time
to finally give up,” I replied, trying to backpedal out of this now uncomfortable conversation. “I thought Chatz did an excellent job
portraying how she felt in pictures, being sad and also weary from the dying process.” Realizing this was not the way I had
envisioned Susie reacting to my words, I became quiet,
avoiding her look.
Maybe
Susie did not understand what I had said about my own experience with
my mother. I felt I needed to let her know that I actually had been
in a similar situation to that portrayed in the book.
I
continued, “With Mother, I was still pushing the Ensure until the
time she finally quit drinking it, as well as when she no longer
swallowed water.” More silence, then I looked again at Susie with
just a tear coming from one of my eyes, brushing it away with the
back of my hand. “I just meant that having a mother die is a
process that no one wants to go through or even talk about, other
than to say how hard it is on the person dying. But it is hard on
the caregivers, too,” I finished. Then thinking about The Grim
Reaper scene toward the last chapter, I half smiled to myself. “OK,
if not funny, Chatz understood it. And she cartooned it in a way that
should earn her top
billing on the New York Times book list.”
Susie shrugged, got up from the chair, tidied around her work space, said
goodbye and left. “She
thinks I am a jerk talking about the book being funny,” I muttered
to myself. And here I was just like one of those helpful hospice
volunteers in the book who won't give an answer to a family member who questions
how long their loved one has left.
I
realized that I had better be wary talking about the book being
humorous; Susie was likely typical in thinking that this death
business was nothing to joke about, especially at the hospice office.
But
in those earlier hours of the morning when I had finished the book, I
had thought it extremely poignant. And funny. I decided to be a
little more circumspect when talking about Can't We
Talk About Something More Pleasant?
No comments:
Post a Comment